FFR指导的血运重建(FFR vs. MT)
2016-04-15 12:15:51 0 举报
登录查看完整内容
FFR(冠状动脉血流储备分数)和MT(微血管阻力)是两种常用的血运重建指导方法。FFR是指冠状动脉狭窄病变远端的压力与主动脉压力的比值,用于评估心肌缺血的程度。而MT则是指微血管对血液流动的阻力,用于评估心肌缺血的范围。在血运重建手术中,FFR和MT都可以作为重要的参考指标,帮助医生选择最佳的治疗方案。但是,两者的优缺点也有所不同。FFR可以更准确地评估心肌缺血的程度,但需要特殊的设备和技术;而MT则可以更全面地评估心肌缺血的范围,但测量过程较为复杂。因此,在选择血运重建方案时,医生需要综合考虑患者的具体情况和两种指标的优缺点。
作者其他创作
大纲/内容
457 patients underwent FFR
Lost to follow-up(n=10)
FFR-guided group (n=327)
All stenoses with an FFR>0.8 and received medical therapy
Lost to follow-up(n=4)
Analyzed on primary endpoint(n=193)
Analyzed on primary endpoint(n=62)
At least one stenosis with an FFR ≤0.80 and all treated with PCI
68 Were not eligible 29 Had left main artery stenosis 7 Had prior CABG 3 Underwent CABG rather than PCI 7 Only had FFR value of branch vessel 7 Had data missing 4 Only had a post-PCI FFR value 11 Had FFR>0.8 but recevied PCI
MT group (n=62)
PCI group(n=134)
Lost to follow-up(n=5)
Analyzed on primary endpoint(n=134)
At least one stenosis with an FFR ≤0.80 and received medical therapy(MT)
Defer group (n=193)
389 patients enrolled
0 条评论
回复 删除
下一页