元翔与隆祥举证对比图
2017-01-23 14:55:24 0 举报
在元翔与隆祥的举证对比图中,我们可以看到两者在数据和证据方面的差异。元翔公司展示了一系列详细的数据报告、客户评价和案例研究,充分证明了其产品和服务的优越性。而隆祥公司虽然也提供了一些数据和证据,但相比之下显得较为简单和不够充分。此外,元翔公司在市场调查和行业分析方面也做了更多的工作,展示了对市场的深入了解和把握。总体来说,元翔公司在举证方面表现得更为全面和深入,有力地支持了其观点和主张。
作者其他创作
大纲/内容
Business team work
Reach a settlement or receive judgement
Quarlified
Final check payment status
Business starts to collect AR
Overdue unpaid
Full payment from client
usually 6-12 weeks
usually 2 weeks
1 week
Client's overdue payment
Legal sends to external lawyer for pre-litigation analysis
Filing the case to court (lawyer fee occurs)
not exceeding 3 months
Apply for compulsory enforcement to court
OTC work
Double-confirm no other available collection approaches
Legal notifies lawyer to prepare filing documents
Legal work
Receiving filing acceptance and payment of litigation fee
Business verification and assessment of counter-risk
Immediately
Legal/lawyer identifies unqualified for litigation:1. no solid evidence of overdue payment2. have serious counter-risk
Termination of enforcement
Business collects evidences under guidance of OTC
Business decides to launch lawsuit (stream leader's approval)
Send a lawyer letter
2 months
1 month
usually in 15 days if with a judgement
2 weeks
usually 6 months
3 working days
Lawyer sends documents to Legal for confirmation and issuance
Double-check on counter-risk and business approval
OTC submits to Legal processing pre-litigation assessment
1 working day
Cycle Time of Debt-Collection Work
Receiving acceptance of compulsory enforment and payment of enforcement fee
1 month after delivery of letter
Legal approves to initiate lawsuit
收藏
0 条评论
下一页